<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>introspective snapshots - Latest Comments in http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://introspectivesnapshots.disqus.com/</link><description>Shey's blog — discussing social media, business, blogging, design, and more.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:02:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570541</link><description>Joel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lately, I've been thinking about some of the writers I read in social media that have that edge, like Seth Godin and Hugh McLeod, or more importantly, I've been thinking about capturing your realizations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lately, I've had a flood of realizations about my work in New Orleans. Many of them feel great to me, but come out sounding bitter. Basically, it's a conviction that I can't quite articulate, and furthermore, the conventional wisdom I keep hearing is rubbish, but I can't articulate that either, so you end up saying very contrarian things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you are thinking new thoughts, and you eventually get yourself sorted out and you can express your new understanding, then all you're doing is feeling your way in the dark in public.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, there are authors out there who, like you say, can't get past the backlash stage, or maybe they are just mimicking and don't really have a place to take it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Alan Gutierrez's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thinknola/blog/think/~3/272282251/" rel="nofollow"&gt;No Justice for Dinneral Shavers, No Justice for New Orleans&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Gutierrez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:02:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570540</link><description>Thanks for a thought provoking post. I like your term "interpreters." Many factors spawn new media d-bags:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Insane quest for novelty. The idea that everyone is TechCrunch or Valleywag and needs to "scoop" everyone else&lt;br&gt;* In-your-faceness. The need to be controversial to stimulate blog traffic/ Totally inconsistent with altruistic virtues like "helping people"&lt;br&gt;* Fear of appearing uncool. Everything that happened over 10 days ago is passe, so don't talk about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;joel's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.socializedpr.com/i-love-people-who-dont-get-it/" rel="nofollow"&gt;I LOVE people who “don’t get it”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 04:36:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570538</link><description>Hi Shey,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great article.  I know what you are saying!  In fact, that's what my blog is all about!  I even wrote an article on &lt;a href="http://www.scribkin.com/2008/03/28/primer-social-bookmarking/" rel="nofollow"&gt;social bookmarking&lt;/a&gt; with an emphasis on del.icio.us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm really not trying to self-promote too much, but I wanted to let you know there are people like me and &lt;a href="www.shegeeks.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;Corvida&lt;/a&gt; out there that are trying to break down social media software and review the best of what's out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Phil's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.scribkin.com/2008/04/14/what-do-you-call-a-twitter-spam-account/" rel="nofollow"&gt;What Do You Call A Twitter Spam Account?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:52:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570537</link><description>Great post. You've really hit the nail on the head.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The real value is in the discussion, one post or tought may start it but it's what comes after that counts. The old saying goes that two heads are better than one but what about 10, 1000, 1000000. The more people that can be engaged the better and if those people are from different walks of life, cultures, etc. then better still. The geek echo chamber will normally just go round in circles but when you get someone in from the outside with a totally different view it can get people thinking in ways that hadn't previously considered.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for getting me thinking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Colin Walker's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/04/16/social-bookmarking-for-social-media/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Social bookmarking for social media.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Colin Walker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:15:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570536</link><description>Thanks guys, glad to hear others are thinking along the same lines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rick, it's definitely hard to get to "non-technical" folks to understand our techie stuff.  I have an upcoming post that should make that a little easier, stay tuned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:17:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570535</link><description>Shey, this is a great post.  Like Lisa and Derek, this topic has been on my mind for some time and I've been wondering how to explain the technologies and concepts to others.  It's at the core of what I'm trying to move into from a pure "IT" guy for a number of years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/rickmahn" title="Visit me on Twitter..." rel="nofollow"&gt;Rick Mahn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rick Mahn's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.rickmahn.com/~r/Rickmahncom/~3/264564812/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Happiness CXLIX&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Mahn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570534</link><description>found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerry Galino</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:08:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570533</link><description>Good stuff.  Your point resonates with me -  someone who has long tried to build real community with technology and actually apply it to my work/life journey.  Actually using this stuff for more than just talking about this stuff is where it gets exciting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;lisa rokusek's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.rinobuddha.com/2008/03/recruiters-on-safari.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Recruiters on Safari&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lisa rokusek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:02:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570532</link><description>Very thought-provoking post. Really solidifies points that have been floating at the back of my mind. Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derek Morrison</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:50:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570531</link><description>Exactly.  I think this also ties it to Rob's comment — we all jump on the latest Web 2.0 app / Social media community because we love the excitement of exploration, discussion, and debating the use brand new technologies and communities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the very nature of the early-adopter mentality means that they move on to the next fad very quickly.  This produces a huge problem if you're trying to a decent product lifetime.  The reason why Facebook and Flickr are so successful is because they've maintained sustainability by getting the general population hooked — early adoption and widespread/general adoption.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The gen. pop. has adopted because someone told them where the value was — how using these tools can help them solve a problem or take advantage of an opportunity.  That's where the real potential lies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570530</link><description>Shey&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a nice conversation starter and a nice conversation. I suggest that you turn it into a narrative. I'll start by sharing a link to a complaint of mine which always summed up evangelist to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogometer.com/post/datataggrtv/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blogometer.com/post/datataggrtv/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not that everyone who tells me about their product is so clueless. There are people who are finding ways to support recovery activity in the gulf using web based software, but they are far more engaged.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point of this is that, with software, a lucky few will stumble upon a YouTube, Twitter or StumbleUpon. The rest have to either be content to have a small user base and smaller costs, or else they have to support their software. At that point, it's not evangelism, it's real work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A good Web 2.0 startup will drop the nonsense talk of "evangelization" and realize that software doesn't grow because of evangelism, it grows because it solves problems. We're not your evangelists, we're deploying your your software for you and applying it to problems in our problem domains.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Alan Gutierrez's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blogometer.com/post/troubleshooting-ljubljanablogometercom/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Troubleshooting ljubljana.blogometer.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Gutierrez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:01:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570529</link><description>That's a great analogy, it captures the essence of what I'm trying to say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The social media community needs to stop playing in the sandbox — the beach and ocean are just a few steps away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by Robs :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:26:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570528</link><description>Great post Shey!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your post puts me in mind with the difference between Apple's marketing and that of the other MP3 manufacturers at the time of the iPod's arrival.  Everyone else was talking in terms of bitrates and Mbs of storage and decibel range, when along comes Apple who simply say, "it holds 10,000 songs".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mocked the approach at the time, "Since when is a song a unit of measurement?"  But they got it.  Talk to what people know.  Talk to what people understand.  Provide solutions to people's problems or enable them as they've never been enabled before.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We in the thick of it can get caught up in one platform over another.  FriendFeed vs SocialThing. facebook or MySpace or Ning. Digg. Mahalo. Flickr. del.icio.us.  The individual platforms that are so deeply and hotly contested and debated and discussed to death now are just not going to matter as I guarantee few of them will still be contenders 10 years from now, and any that are will be distant and alien from what we're playing on today. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those are the bit rates and storage capacity. We get off on those things because, well, heck, because we love it so.  We're geeks and nerds and early adopters.  But everyone else?  Everyone else just want to know they can carry 10k songs in their pocket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rob Clark's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.theelusivefish.com/articles/2008/03/31/twitter-updates-for-2008-03-31/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Twitter Updates for 2008-03-31&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Clark</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:48:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2008/04/01/we-need-social-media-interpreters-not-more-evangelists/#comment-1570527</link><description>I just stopped by your blog and thought I would say hello. I like your site design.  Looking forward to reading more down the road.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robert Michel</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Michel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:51:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>