Your post makes me think of the musical concept of dissonance. A dissonant note doesn't fit--it's not in harmony--and yet it can add something to the composition.
Life (and social media) without dissonance gets boring. :)
.LAG
· 1 year ago
i've noticed is that it seems much easier to build up an audience of followers if you stick to one topic -- if that's your goal: to raise your profile. if you're blog is "all over the place" topically, then people don't know what to expect, it seems. it seems like the blogosphere doesn't suffer jack-of-all-interests bloggers very well. personally, i prefer to be all over the place, mostly because my blog is more like a notebook that I keep which just happens to be public, and i'm interested in many, many things. it all boils down to your goals for publishing a blog in the first place, i suppose.
Shey
· 1 year ago
"it seems like the blogosphere doesn't suffer jack-of-all-interests bloggers very well" -- I agree with this; but while I believe there should be a central focus, there has to be some wiggle room as well to spice things up.
Your blog is one of a kind :)
Shey
· 1 year ago
Very interesting analogy, thanks for that :)
jpostman
· 1 year ago
A great post, Shey, and a favorite topic of mine. I try to diversify my friends lists, and I have been very fortunate to get to know artists, writers, troublemakers, anarchists, environmentalists, and people in all kinds of professions (or not in any profession) all over the world. The whole social networking experience is so much more rewarding when we get outside the narrowness of our own familiar circles.
Shey
· 1 year ago
I think that's the way to go -- thanks Joel
Rahsheen
· 1 year ago
Great post, Shey.
I try to make sure I subscribe to a diverse set of individuals by interacting in a bunch of different places.
One of the primary methods that gets me hooked up to people that may share interests slightly outside of my own is the FriendFeed Friend-of-a-Friend feature. I'm not sure people realize how powerful this is expanding your circle of "friends" and keeping things from becoming monotonous.
To me, people that disable the FoaF feature are just sealing themselves into the echo chamber, blocking out all daylight.
Services like Rejaw, Kwippy and I believe Plurk also give you the chance to interact with people outside of your primary circle.
Shey
· 1 year ago
FOAF is definitely a powerful feature in FriendFeed, one that we all could make use of more often.
Mona N.
· 1 year ago
Nice piece, Shey. :) Like you, I don't care about 'noise' and announcing how I'm going to 'clean up my list to filter noise'. I like diversity in my content and all about being positive and spreading positive vibes... After all, it's always easier to be negative than positive ;)
Thanks for this write-up. You rock!
Shey
· 1 year ago
Thanks Mona :)
maverickny
· 1 year ago
Nice post, Shey. I agree with what you've said and aside from hiding Digg and Stumbles, I read much is what is in my feed and learn a lot from people holding different views. It helps improve your own thinking and often times, one comes across a comment that makes one think differently rather than perpetuating the same old, same old.
Shey
· 1 year ago
Thanks Sally, learning from others is a great benefit of participating in social media.
zoeDisco
· 1 year ago
i also like to diversify the content that i produce. when i first started blogging i kept my topic in the public relations/communications tunnel and I started to notice that echo chamber feeling. i made a decision to change the scope of my blog to include all of the fun (and not so fun) things in my life and because of that I've gained a whole new set of readers.
great post shey!
Shey
· 1 year ago
I'm beginning to realize this as well as are other bloggers. I think many have gotten a little TOO focused on one topic.
Even if I know my audience isn't going to love it, I'll still post anyway for variety's sake and because I also know at least a few people will benefit from it.
Thanks Zoe!
KnightKnetwork
· 1 year ago
I'm sure it was Steve's McCain supporter unsubscription post that inspired this. I had a very similar reaction to you and said so on the thread (David Knight). Steve remained subscribed to me and then later posted the following comment:
"Interesting points of view all, I feel the need to clarify a bit. My initial post was a reaction to another thread where some of the commenters were actively anti-Obama. I only ended up un-following/friending 2 people, NOT exhaustively wiping anyone who mentioned McCain support from my entire digital life. I agree with all the comments here regarding the richness and vitality of discussion with those of differing viewpoints. That said, I feel that the US has been on deeply wrong track for too many years... - (steve isaacs)"
Despite his choice of words to start with I think he was just dropping people engaging in political Trolling, a practice I follow no matter what party someone supports.
Shey
· 1 year ago
Actually, I saw it after I had written most of the post — but it re-affirmed that this trend has already been happening.
Louis Gray
· 1 year ago
It is not uncommon for people to congregate in areas where their viewpoints are shared, and where they're likely to get positive feedback or see others like them. As sites and services grow, and filters increase, there is greater opportunity to reduce the influence from others, whether they be different than you by politics, race, religion, etc.
In February of 2006, when nobody was paying attention to my blog (a simpler time), I wrote about this issue:
Participating in a diversified community increases the chances of, actually, finding, learning or communicating something new. Excellent post Shey even though with you latest seesmic engagement, I was afraid it was going to be a while before we see another post :)
Shelly
· 1 year ago
Twitter is indeed fascinating. I'm watching a married guy I know, in his mid 40's, stalking a 23 year old. i can tell by the lame stupid things he posts he is trying to engage her. It's fascinating and disgusting at the same time. She has no clue and he is very manipulative and this stuff seems to work for him (obviously only for a short time, until the female realizes he's full of sh*t.) I know some of the little things he posts are outright lies. Fortunately she's got a lot of friends and a job she appears to love, so she's not desperate for attention. Twitter is ust another venue for narcissitic a*holes to inflict themselves on the rest of us. I'd never use it.
Laarni
· 1 year ago
Well, I love differences. :D
Michael Tefft
· 1 year ago
Great post. I read something similar a few days ago, or maybe it was your post. I find that most people I interact with on Twitter and Friendfeed are pretty open minded and tolerant of others views. Unfortunately I have been blocked before simply because I said something in defense of Fox News and Bill O'Reilly.
seo2020
· 1 year ago
Hey Shey,
You are right on this point... I grow very tired of the same narrow minded view on many topics that seem to have evangelists for a specific point of view. People do follow these people like a herd and any new information or insight is either suppressed or met with hostility and ego.
The best way to deal with closed loop communities, in my experience, has been to be controversial and inject your arguments in an undeniable way. The steps I take to make a mark in these types of communities is the subject of a future blog post for you (or me).
I appreciate your insight.
Charles Heflin Twitter @CharlesHeflin
wvrearvumirr
· 1 year ago
It's the folks that don't subscribe to the fact that we don't all dance to the same tune that can make it so difficult to enjoy.
I have tried to communicate my idea's on a subject without being abrasive ~ only to be attacked and even hunted down so they can try to discredit me in any way possible.
This may be why many choose to stay inside 'the bubble'.
Great post Shey!
newmediamike
· 1 year ago
Excellent point Shey and I'm actually doing just what you recommend. I heard you comment at WordCamp today. When I came home I searched Twitter for all posts related to #wcto08 and added anyone I didn't already follow. Sorry, make that EVERYONE I didn't already follow. Why? To broaden my horizons beyond the usual suspects and to possibly engage in some new conversations ... like this one!
Shey
· 1 year ago
That's a great outlook Mike,
Thanks!
sHaE-sHaE
· 1 year ago
Nice post. I tend to be drawn toward diversity so the social narcissism hasn't been much of an issue.
Brett Borders
· 1 year ago
Hi Shey... thanks for touching on this topic... my advice is to try and be extroverted and think of others. Today I wrote a very similar piece on social media "rockstars" vs. "narcissists" :
All Comments
Life (and social media) without dissonance gets boring. :)
Your blog is one of a kind :)
I try to make sure I subscribe to a diverse set of individuals by interacting in a bunch of different places.
One of the primary methods that gets me hooked up to people that may share interests slightly outside of my own is the FriendFeed Friend-of-a-Friend feature. I'm not sure people realize how powerful this is expanding your circle of "friends" and keeping things from becoming monotonous.
To me, people that disable the FoaF feature are just sealing themselves into the echo chamber, blocking out all daylight.
Services like Rejaw, Kwippy and I believe Plurk also give you the chance to interact with people outside of your primary circle.
Thanks for this write-up. You rock!
great post shey!
Even if I know my audience isn't going to love it, I'll still post anyway for variety's sake and because I also know at least a few people will benefit from it.
Thanks Zoe!
"Interesting points of view all, I feel the need to clarify a bit. My initial post was a reaction to another thread where some of the commenters were actively anti-Obama. I only ended up un-following/friending 2 people, NOT exhaustively wiping anyone who mentioned McCain support from my entire digital life. I agree with all the comments here regarding the richness and vitality of discussion with those of differing viewpoints. That said, I feel that the US has been on deeply wrong track for too many years... - (steve isaacs)"
Despite his choice of words to start with I think he was just dropping people engaging in political Trolling, a practice I follow no matter what party someone supports.
In February of 2006, when nobody was paying attention to my blog (a simpler time), I wrote about this issue:
Blogging Bifurcation - A Web Divided
http://www.louisgray.com/live/2006/02/blogging-...
Disagreement is healthy. Ignorance is unhealthy.
Twitter is ust another venue for narcissitic a*holes to inflict themselves on the rest of us. I'd never use it.
You are right on this point... I grow very tired of the same narrow minded view on many topics that seem to have evangelists for a specific point of view. People do follow these people like a herd and any new information or insight is either suppressed or met with hostility and ego.
The best way to deal with closed loop communities, in my experience, has been to be controversial and inject your arguments in an undeniable way. The steps I take to make a mark in these types of communities is the subject of a future blog post for you (or me).
I appreciate your insight.
Charles Heflin
Twitter @CharlesHeflin
I have tried to communicate my idea's on a subject without being abrasive ~ only to be attacked and even hunted down so they can try to discredit me in any way possible.
This may be why many choose to stay inside 'the bubble'.
Great post Shey!
Thanks!
http://socialmediarockstar.com/social-media-roc...